In a world where financial transactions are getting faster and faster than the traditional cash and hours at the bank phenomenon, people have to be careful not to have themselves wound up in crime, being wanted by the authorities because they were unfortunately victims of money laundering schemes by criminals
Payment service providers (PSPs) are third-party companies that enable businesses to accept electronic payments, such as credit cards, debit cards, and digital wallets. PSPs act as intermediaries between those who make payments, which include consumers, and those who accept them (retailers). They bring convenience to businesses accepting a wide range of payment methods which are secure, reliable and very handy at helping businesses scale processing payments as their businesses grow. Popular examples of these PSPs include Stripe, PayPal, Square, Paga, Adyen, Worldpay, Visa Checkout and Mastercard Payment Gateway.
Payment service providers (PSPs) often provide merchant services and act as a payment gateway or payment processor for e-commerce and brick-and-mortar businesses, and with that, they have to be careful that they do not have their services being used by criminals to fund some illicit money for some phoney or overpriced business transactions.
Before we go on, let us find out in essence what anti-money laundering is and how it comes forth into the PSPs world.
What is Anti-Money Laundering?
Anti-money laundering (AML) compliance refers to the set of regulations and procedures that financial institutions and payment processors must follow to detect, prevent, and report activities associated with money laundering. Money laundering involves disguising the origins of illegally obtained funds by making them appear legitimate.
AML compliance is important because it helps to protect the financial system; of which Payment service providers are a part; from money laundering and terrorist financing. It also helps to protect financial institutions and payment processors from being used to facilitate these crimes.
Payment Service Providers (PSPs) sometimes also offer risk management services for card and bank-based payments, transaction payment matching, digital wallets, reporting, fund remittance, currency exchange and fraud protection and that shows how they have got their hands up in the compliance system of which Anti-money laundering is a part of.
Why Is AML Compliance Important For Payment Service Providers (PSPs)?
PSPs are particularly vulnerable to money laundering because they provide a variety of services that can be used to move and conceal money, such as electronic money transfers, online payments, and mobile payments. Additionally, PSPs often have a large customer base with a wide range of risk profiles.
Anti-money laundering (AML) compliance comes in very handy because it
Protect PSPs customers from fraud and other financial crimes.
Help these companies maintain a good reputation with regulators and other financial institutions.
Help PSPs avoid costly fines and penalties that will come when they are found to have been used by money launderers.
What Are The Key Challenges Payment Service Providers Face On AML Compliance
The following are the various challenges payment service providers face when trying to comply with AML rules:
The key challenges of AML compliance for PSPs include:
1. The complexity of money laundering methods
Money launderers are constantly developing new and sophisticated methods to conceal the origins of their illegal funds. PSPs must be able to keep up with these latest trends and develop effective AML controls to mitigate the risks.
2. Increased regulations
PSPs are subject to increasingly stringent AML regulations, which can be complex and costly to implement.
3. Uncooperative attitudes
Lack of cooperation and information sharing between financial institutions and regulatory authorities. This can make it difficult for PSPs to identify and report suspicious activity.
4. Lack of data and technology resources
Small and medium-sized PSPs may not have the resources to invest in the latest AML technology and solutions, and this brings loopholes in their system that money launderers will exploit which can cause a whole world of harm to their reputation.
5. Deficit of skilled personnel
It can be difficult to find and retain qualified AML professionals and many up-and-coming PSPs are unable to hire the services of compliance experts because of the cost of their operations and the tools required to get them running on their platform.
6. Organisational structure
PSPs may face specific challenges depending on their business model and customer base. For example, PSPs that serve high-risk customers, such as those in offshore jurisdictions or with anonymous accounts, may face greater AML challenges.
With all these challenges, one tends to wonder how payment service providers are able to get themselves immune to the virus of money laundering. The solutions below can help them.
Solutions to The Key Challenges Payment Service Providers Face On AML Compliance
Payment Service Providers can overcome the challenges highlighted above by developing a comprehensive AML compliance program that is tailored to their specific risks. This program should include
Strong customer due diligence (CDD) procedures: PSPs should collect and verify information about their customers to identify their identity and risk profile.
Effective transaction monitoring: PSPs should monitor customer transactions to identify suspicious activity that may be indicative of money laundering.
Robust suspicious activity reporting (SAR) procedures: PSPs should report any suspicious activity to the appropriate authorities.
Adequate training for staff: All staff should be trained on AML compliance procedures.
Regular risk assessments: PSPs should assess their AML risks regularly and update their compliance program accordingly.
By taking these steps, PSPs can mitigate the risks of money laundering and terrorist financing, and protect themselves from the legal and reputational risks associated with these crimes. In order to show how practical these steps are, we shall be highlighting on them below.
Effective Customer Due Diligence Measures For Payment Service Providers
Customer due diligence (CDD) is the process by which payment service providers (PSPs) collect and verify information about their customers to identify their identity and risk profile. CDD is an important part of AML compliance, as it helps to prevent PSPs from being used to facilitate money laundering and other financial crimes.
There are three levels of CDD available to PSPs:
1. Standard CDD
This is the basic level of CDD that is required for all customers. PSPs must collect and verify the customer’s name, address, date of birth, and nationality. They must also verify the customer’s identity by obtaining a copy of a government-issued ID document.
2. Enhanced CDD
This is a higher level of CDD that is required for customers who are considered to be high-risk. High-risk customers include those who are politically exposed persons (PEPs), those who live in high-risk jurisdictions, and those who are involved in high-risk activities. For enhanced CDD, PSPs must collect additional information about the customer, such as their source of income and the purpose of the business relationship.
3. Simplified CDD
This is a lower level of CDD that is allowed for certain types of customers, such as low-risk individual customers and low-risk businesses. For simplified CDD, PSPs may not be required to collect and verify all of the same information as they would for standard or enhanced CDD.
The level of CDD that a PSP is required to perform depends on the risk profile of the customer. PSPs should conduct a risk assessment of each customer to determine the appropriate level of CDD.
Conducting effective CDD benefits the PSPs as it helps them:
Reduce the risk of money laundering and other financial crimes by knowing their customers and their business relationships so as to identify and report suspicious activity.
Protect the financial system from abuse from being used to facilitate money laundering and other financial crimes.
Enhance their reputation as PSPs that are known for their strong CDD practices are viewed as being more reliable and trustworthy; thus attracting new customers and partners.
How Can Payment Service Providers Conduct Effective Customer Due Diligence?
Payment service providers (PSPs) can conduct effective customer due diligence (CDD) by following these steps:
Identify the customer’s risk profile by considering factors such as the customer’s type of business, country of residence, and source of funds.
Collect the necessary information from the customer including the customer’s name, address, date of birth, nationality, and government-issued ID. For high-risk customers, PSPs may also need to collect additional information, such as the source of income and the purpose of the business relationship.
Verify the customer’s information by checking the customer’s ID against government records or by using a third-party verification service.
Monitor the customer’s account activity for any suspicious activity that may indicate money laundering or other financial crimes.
Report any suspicious activity to the appropriate financial crime authorities.
Effective Transaction Monitoring Measures For Payment Service Providers
Transaction monitoring for payment service providers (PSPs) is the process of PSPs monitoring customer transactions to identify suspicious activity that may be indicative of money laundering or other financial crimes. PSPs are required to conduct transaction monitoring by anti-money laundering (AML) regulations and to do that they are to employ any of the two main types of transaction monitoring which are: rules-based monitoring and risk-based monitoring.
1. Rules-based monitoring
This type of monitoring uses pre-defined rules to identify suspicious activity. These rules are based on known money laundering and other financial crime typologies.
For example, a rule might be set to flag all transactions over a certain amount, all transactions from high-risk jurisdictions, or all transactions involving certain types of products or services. PSPs can also create custom rules based on their specific risk profile and customer base.
When a transaction meets one of the pre-defined rules, it is flagged for review by a human analyst. The analyst will then determine whether the transaction is suspicious or not. If the analyst determines that the transaction is suspicious, they will report it to the appropriate authorities.
Rules-based monitoring is great to use due to the fact that it is a simple and straightforward way to identify suspicious activity; is relatively easy to implement and maintain; and can be used to monitor a large volume of transactions.
However, it can be a problem as it has the tendency to generate false positives; miss suspicious transactions that do not match any of the pre-defined rules, and is not as effective as risk-based monitoring at identifying complex and sophisticated money laundering schemes.
2. Risk-based monitoring
This type of monitoring uses risk models to identify suspicious activity. Risk models are based on historical data of known money laundering cases.
Risk-based monitoring takes into account a variety of factors, such as the customer’s risk profile, the type of transaction, and the amount of the transaction. For example, a transaction from a high-risk customer or a transaction involving a large amount of money may be considered riskier than a transaction from a low-risk customer or a transaction involving a small amount of money.
Risk-based monitoring is more complex than rules-based monitoring, but it is also more effective at identifying suspicious activity. This is because risk-based monitoring can identify suspicious transactions that do not match any of the pre-defined rules.
When a transaction is flagged by the risk-based monitoring system, it is reviewed by a human analyst. The analyst will then determine whether the transaction is suspicious or not. If the analyst determines that the transaction is suspicious, they will report it to the appropriate authorities.
Risk-based monitoring is great to use because it is more effective at identifying suspicious activity than rules-based monitoring; can identify complex and sophisticated money laundering schemes; and can be tailored to the specific risk profile of the PSP and its customers.
However, it is important to understand that risk-based monitoring also has some limitations, including the fact that it can be complex to implement and maintain; can be expensive to implement and maintain; and can also generate false positives.
To get the best results, PSPs often use a combination of rules-based and risk-based monitoring to identify suspicious activity.
Another simple use is in loan applications. For examples, persons with certain risk level (e.g poor credit score) can have their application automatically rejected.
How Can Payment Service Providers Implement Effective Transaction Monitoring?
Payment service providers (PSPs) can implement effective transaction monitoring by following these steps:
Conduct a risk assessment to identify the PSP’s specific risks. This includes considering factors such as the type of customers served, the products and services offered, and the geographic regions served.
Implement a risk-based approach to focus its monitoring efforts on the transactions that pose the highest risk.
Use a combination of rules-based and risk-based monitoring as Rules-based monitoring uses pre-defined rules to flag suspicious transactions, while Risk-based monitoring uses risk models to identify suspicious transactions. Using both helps improve the accuracy and effectiveness of their transaction monitoring program.
Invest in technology solutions that can help PSPs automate and streamline their transaction monitoring processes, ultimately improving the efficiency and effectiveness of their transaction monitoring program.
Train staff on transaction monitoring procedures so that they can identify and report suspicious activity.
Use a robust case management system to track and investigate suspicious activity.
By following these steps, PSPs can implement effective transaction monitoring and reduce the risk of being used to facilitate money laundering and other financial crimes.
It is also important to note that there is no one-size-fits-all approach to transaction monitoring. The best approach for a particular PSP will depend on its specific risks and resources.
What Is Suspicious Activity Reporting (SAR) For Payment Service Providers?
Suspicious activity reporting (SAR) for payment service providers (PSPs) is the process of reporting suspicious activity to the appropriate authorities. SAR is required by anti-money laundering (AML) regulations as an important tool in the fight against money laundering and other financial crimes. By reporting suspicious activity, PSPs can help to protect the financial system and their customers.
PSPs should have a clear process for SAR reporting. This process should include:
Identifying suspicious activity
Investigating suspicious activity
Reporting suspicious activity to the appropriate authorities
PSPs should also train their staff on how to identify and report suspicious activity.
When Should Suspicious Activities Be Reported By Payment Service Providers?
Payment Service Providers (PSPs) are required to report any suspicious activity to the appropriate authorities when they detect activities that suggest money laundering, terrorist financing, or other financial crimes.
Here are some examples of suspicious activity that PSPs may need to report:
Large cash transactions
Transactions involving high-risk countries or customers
Structuring transactions to avoid reporting requirements
Unexplained changes in transaction patterns
Transactions that are inconsistent with the customer’s profile or business activities
Rules For Effective Suspicious Activity Reporting
To be effective in reporting suspicious activities to the authorities, payment service providers (PSPs) should work according to the following rules:
Report any suspicious activity, even if it is not clear whether or not it is a crime.
Be specific and detailed in your report.
Include all relevant information, such as the customer’s name, account number, and the suspicious activity itself.
Submit your report promptly.
How Can Payment Service Providers File A Suspicious Activity Report?
Payment service providers (PSPs) can file a suspicious activity report (SAR) by following these steps:
Identify the suspicious activity using transaction monitoring systems, customer due diligence procedures, and employee training.
Investigate the suspicious activity to determine whether it is likely to be related to money laundering, terrorist financing, or other financial crimes.
File a Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) with the appropriate authorities including all relevant information about the suspicious activity, such as the customer’s name, account number, and the suspicious activity itself.
Keep a copy of the Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) for a certain period of time, typically five years in case they might be acted upon or referenced.
Payment service providers can file SARs electronically or by paper. The preferred method of filing SARs is electronically. Most countries have a financial intelligence unit (FIU) that is responsible for receiving and analysing SARs. Payment service providers can find information on how to file SARs on the country’s designated FIU’s website.
It is also important to note that Payment service providers are not required to prove that a crime has occurred before filing a SAR. If a PSP has a reasonable suspicion of money laundering, terrorist financing, or other financial crimes, they are required to file a SAR.
Now that we have checked out the various parts of AML compliance for payment service providers, let us not forget that the battle to keep money launderers and criminals out of the financial system does not just end with putting these things in place. Their efforts should be continuous while keeping in mind the need to:
Tailor their AML compliance procedures to the risk profile of each customer.
Keep up with the latest regulations by regularly reviewing their AML compliance procedures to be up-to-date.
Train staff on AML compliance procedures so that they can identify and report suspicious activity.
Use technology to automate AML compliance tasks to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the compliance process.
By following these steps, payment service providers can conduct effective AML compliance and reduce the risk of being used to facilitate money laundering and other financial crimes.
Join + 750 worldwide organisations who trust Youverify with their AML compliance. Book a demo today to see how it works!